If the whole process can be in auto-pilot, great. Which means changes are made constantly to satisfy my perception of musicĪnd trying different ways to accomplish a faster composition process and Not a detailed description as this is becoming a personal system of sorts, On the very left of Excel, you’ll see a description of what those numbers mean. This is a way to organize the 1:1 relationship between two programs. Orange cells in Excel are patterns in Renoise. These collision of ideas is of course subject to change. Since you have a strong background in mathematics, I’ll mention John Boyd (military strategist).Īnd the pitch to tempo is influenced by Haskell and Fox. Analyzing each person’s contribution and then synthesizing it. I’ve got a decent list of names that should be I’m in no way taking credit for this stuff. Which makes it easier to sync things up with that meaningful image exciter formula.

Which I suppose could be more important than music.Įxcel organizes numbers really well, in this case, music related numbers, To make music to, which also doubles as a form of psychological self-exploration. A formulaic way to excite a meaningful image in the mind Which is what I’ve been after for some time. Inspired by this word and numbers workflow, I was able to grid what I call “Context Builder”. I transferred my text charts, guides, and steps to Excel. To answer your question without getting too much into details as to how…Įxcel allows words and words with formulas - which I haven’t used yet. Idea > Excel (phone) > LSDJ (phone) > Renoise It took about a week to see if it could do the job (phone and web syncing).Įxcel on the phone is fairly limited, but the real test was in translation. I thought I’d give Excel a shot, it came with the phone. I like plain text because I can grid everything. It started as a way to make music on the go. I’d advise the first example using the power function, because it clearly shows what you’re doing to the value.Īnd a Google spreadsheet to show that all results are the same: We know that 60 / 64 will always equal 0.9375, so… =55*0.9375īut the last two examples are simply for fun. Simplifying it a bit further, we know that 2^6 will always equal 64, so this also works: =(55/64)*60Īnd further still, since these factors 64 and 60 remain constant in your formula, you can flip it around a bit and simplify the whole thing into a single multiplication. So you can use the power function, or simply ^ for short. If you’re dividing by 2 six times, then you are dividing by 2 raised to the power of 6. Is there a shorter way to write this formula (…)

Kigb open .sav file